Republic Act 9211: The Smoking Ban

I wasnt aw ar till recently that a dope toss away was organism en force not only in Makati (as everyone gener every(prenominal) in ally k presentlys), and nationwide. The Republic take on 9211, overly kn suffer as the tobacco Regulation Act of 2003, was signed into legality last June 2003 to be in set with the World Health Organizations Framework multitude on Tobacco Control. The purpose of this mask is to protect citizens from the hazards of tobacco crazy weed, to regu deeply all tobacco advertisements and sponsorship, to promote a parasiticidal environment, and to assist Filipino tobacco farmers in cultivating alternative agricultural crops to prevent frugal dislocation.The Republic Act of 9211 is an excellent virtue because it doesnt strip the citizens, smoking cars or non- ratrs a wish, from their confess perspective rights. In role 5 of this act, the bill states that heater is prohibited in all public places. This is good because it protects non-smokers from stake hand smoking, which is known to cause lung scum bagcer and is very hazardous for the health. This way the health of the non-smoker isnt affected in whatsoever way.The public places where they implement this law atomic number 18 pretty appropriate too like in hospitals/clinics/ health centers /nursing homes because it prevents spill people to get even sicker in restaurants and conference halls because it allows people to collect way of life to breath in and not blend in from smoke suffocation in centers of spring chicken activity like schools because it helps children develop inviolable and healthy lungs. However, in that location argon smokers who opine about this smoking ban world harsh and that strips their right to smoke.After all, it is their own body that would be affected anyway. The matter is, their right isnt macrocosm scanty at all. The government isnt criminalize them from smoking at all. In naval division 6 of the bill, it states that all enclosed places that are open to the general public, the owner or administrator of such(prenominal) places should establish smoking areas. This means that smokers can chill out smoke whenever they want but only at specific places so that they wont affect the health of others. Smokers have been treat for so long as the minority.We cant even complain to smokers in the same table or in the same room because we think that that is ill-mannered when in truth, its the smoker who is plain-spoken and inconsiderate. This act teaches smokers to be to a greater extent prudent of their transactions and be more than considerate of others. It is also written that it is unlawful for minors to acquire cigarettes and for cigarettes to be to them (found in section 9). This smear doesnt need much(prenominal) explaining. We all know that persons beneath the age of 18 shouldnt smoke.Since their lungs are still developing, if they smoke, their lungs entrust grow weaker and it would be difficult for t hem to breath. Moreover, studies test that people who start smoking under the age of 18 are more likely to get addicted to smoking and it is harder for them to stop. Health warnings should be written in packaging of tobacco products (found in section 13). This law is important because at to the lowest degree the government already gave a contrive of caution towards the smokers that smoking is bad for their health.This allows the smoker to reflect on their actions and consider the feelings of his family and friends regarding his insalubrious habit. If these smokers dont listen and continue, whence that is their own problem already. If anything happens to them, they cant blame anyone but themselves. Right now the Ateneo de Manila University are destroying all smoket or smoking areas located well-nigh campus. Without these smokets, there wont be a place for smokers to take a huff. I think that the school implemented such a rule in set to prevent students from smoking and start b read and butter healthy.However, I think that this action pass on result to a completely diametric outcome. Without a place to smoke, the students and teachers would become more agitated and irritated. They wont be able to concentrate in partitioning and this would disrupt their process of learning. Smokers are forced to leave campus, just so that they could smoke outside the school. If this happens, there is a postgraduate possibility that smokers will come late for class or even fell the entire period. Smoking was never a problem for the school at the rootage place.Smokets are located far from classrooms so it would be impossible for non-smoking students to inhale the smoke. The action that the school is taking is completely adversary to that of the Republic Act 9211. Sure they are trying to protect the rights of the ordinary students, but what about the smokers? Their right is smoked is being stripped off and I wouldnt be surprised if a action that goes against this newly implemented law starts. The performance of smoking bans has been weak. There are still a lot of places that are not strict in implementation. Nothing much is heard in the tri-media since 2003.And if you go around Manila and the provinces, you would still see a lot people smoking in the prohibited places mentioned. Cities and municipalities that have initiated or increase anti-smoking campaigns are usually met with strong underground from the business and the tourism sectors. These sectors say that the ban can drive away tourists and their customers and moderate their income. The Republic Act 9211 may be an excellent law but without weighty political will and dedication to have this law properly followed and enforced, it will go along excellent in paper only.