Reflective Paper Essay Example for Free

Reflective Paper EssayIntroduction Organization in the business and industrial setting is like a very interesting organism worthy of private road and time for study. The behavior of tidy sum and the environments with which they ar in constant interaction is a ceaseless address for curiosity and fascinating research. This is so especially during this particular century when technology sparks the m all changes that take lieu. This genesis is in the epoch of arrangingal reform and innovation. The time is marked with rapid changes in the demography of escapeforce, ever-changing corporate culture, and changing institutions. In the light of the rapid shift in todays administrations, the skills undeniable of conductors, beginners in the profession and even aspiring students in the discipline, rest on the foundation of knowledge on the upstanding gamut of nerveal go badment.Corporate America is not without its complications. When the company succeeds, there is with it ( the success) a corresponding concept of responsibilities and liabilities. Organizations thrive today beca utilize of the policies and guidelines they sacrifice managed to fixed firmly in their set-up and translated into their day to day affairs. Big businesses have the competitive edge over differents i.e., over small entrepreneurs, because they have arrived at their positions in the market place by securing certain parameters in the many facets that comprise their organizations. This is especially true on government laws and regulations (McKenna, 2000). It is imperative that organizations in industry and business compete with the changing times. To fail to do so may circuit substantial loss in both the financial and adult male capitals two major components necessary in an organization. Being competitive in todays business jargon is not as elemental as it sounds it involves a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the whole gamut of organizational behavior and the compl ex changes that are high-powered in disposition (Mangelsdorff, 2007). This paper attempts to express in prcis the various facets of the nature of organization with unique(predicate) intentions to elaborate on the student researchers understanding, insights and learnings regarding how quality management and control systems relate with human want. It takes into consideration the vastness of how all these concepts are of signifi rear endce in ones individual descents as well as their relevance of the persons (especially the student researchers) professional plans and actual exit situations. Organizational change though a great settimes unpredictable and incomprehensible to many, still goes through a calendar method the nature of which makes it possible for byplayed people to study with the hopes and intentions of ultimately, implementing revisions or remodeling. These serve to enhance and improve systems and move excellent procedures of handling things or procedures and peo ple (Mangelsdorff, 2007).Problem Statements To be specific, the succeeding(a) questions are addressed in this paperDefine what is meant by strategic planning. Distinguish this from long-range planning and other forms of planning.Planning can lead to organizational change. What do the text writers feel are the issues that face the managerwho plans to bring almost organizational change?How should a planner go about the surgical process of identifying strengths, weaknesses, and distinctive competencies in an organization? What is the involve of the findings on planning?Discuss the relationship between mission statements, planned change, and unplanned change. Use preaching Define what is meant by strategic planning. Distinguish this from long-range planning and other forms of planning. Bruffee, author of Collaborative schooling Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge (1993), explains the need for a to a greater extent efficient, economical and equitable m anagement of the people in the industry or organization has neer been as pronounced as it is today.This need has never been brought about by factors which inevitably affect not scarcely the established structures and ship canal of doing things within the force out area besides also by the to a greater extent meaningful and substantial task of managing the organizations most important asset the human capital. Among these factors are stiffer competition in business rapid changes in technological, competitive and economic environments the explosion of technical and managerial knowledge spiraling wage and benefits cost and so many others. These factors have no doubt been responsible for the emergence of the personnel live on as a vital area in the implementation of corporate strategy. Demick and Miller (1993) places in place setting first what an organization is like and settles how it can affect behavior in general and when that is established, proceeded to explain leadership an d management in this context. In organizational behavior which is basic to the management of human resource, it points to the inquiry and application of learning about how people, individuals, and groups put to death, operate, and work in organizations. It accomplishes this by means of adopting a system approach.Explicitly, it infers people-organization affairs in terms of the full(a) person, group totality, complete organization, and total mixer structure. Its intention is to put up enhance relations by attaining human goals, organizational purposes, and social goals. In such(prenominal) a milieu, the goals to effect change are influenced by several significant factors which are crucial to the overall results. Hence, there are expected leadership behaviors that remark momentum during the change process. Effective strategic planning is a process of analyzing an organizations assets and its take under changing conditions and developing the activities necessary to satisfy these call for. It is essentially a two-step process. The emphasis is on techniques or systems to be applied. The forecasting of needs allows determining of priorities and allocating of resources to where they can do the most good. Analysis of needs leads to program planning. The planning approach defines human resource needs in relation to the organizations overall needs and defines a strategy to satisfy them. In this way, individual development, training programs, recruitment, compensation and other activities become integral part of a high-voltage process.There are different types of planning parenthesis from strategic type of plan. These include the alignment type, the goal-based type, the self-organizing type, and the scenario-based type (McNamara, 2006). The goal-based type of planning is involved with tailoring the process of improving and enhancing the system of operation of an organization with the focus on the organizations goals which may be further narrow according to each of that organizations departments. The alignment type bases its planning strictly on the organizations mission and tailors all activities according to that specific aspect of organizational flow.In particular, the scenario type of planning, however, makes use of the critical areas of the organizations set-up which nay be experiencing problems and issues that may emanate from the external environment such as changing laws and problems outside the firm or establishment which may affect the life, continuity and trenchant productivity of the organization. Lastly, self-organizing type of planning is centered on the organizations core of values and that any or all of the various problems or issues encountered have to be evaluated according to the values of great importance to the members of the organization (McNamara, 2006).-Planning can lead to organizational change. What do the text writers feel are the issues that face the manager who plans to bring about organizational change? Organi zational behavior is actually a complex and dynamic mechanism. It includes the application and integration of theoretical perspectives from the social and behavioral sciences to shed light on how and why individuals take over in a variety of ways in organizations. Included in the study are the ways the individuals carry out their tasks, the structure, design and operation of human persons in simple and complex organizational set-ups (Mangelsdorff, 2007). This is terminated utilizing the systems approach or systems model. The latter is meant as interpreting people and organizational relationships in reference to the whole individual, whole group, whole organization, and whole social system (Knoster et al., 2000). The objective is developing improved and enhanced relationships by attaining individual aims, organizational goals and social aspirations (Mangelsdorff, 2007). Specifically, any student who pursues the study of the concepts involved in the matter willing examine how indiv iduals work in groups acquire insights into human strengths and interpersonal relationships. Intertwined in the study is to delve into theories or principles of motivation of personnel, effective leadership with the goal of formulating a sound thinking and values of management and leadership. Moreover, organizational behavior investigates scientific data and utilizes a variety of research traditions to further understand how individuals work and function efficiently in diverse forms of structures (Shortell et al., 2000) The concepts that are pursued in organizational behavior include the following the evolution and organizational and management theories the rich historical background of management, organizational theories and the development of management thought, are adequately covered in this particular aspect (Robbins,1997). Organizational behavior, when scrutinized closely, thus far covers a hazard of topics. It embraces the understanding of structure, design of the organizatio n itself. It also includes the study of the work design, policies and practices of the human resource, job design, and decision devising as an organization. Furthermore, it also examines the organizational culture, its dynamics where change is aimed to be implemented (Revans, 1982) How should a planner go about the process of identifying strengths, weaknesses, and distinctive competencies in an organization? What is the impact of the findings on planning? Working relationships are a central portion of a persons life. Motivation and dedication to any strain (e.g. work) and the pleasure from it are collective concerns of the organization and the individual. There are definite factors that generate satisfaction, the so-called bonus factors according to Herzberg. These factors push the worker to the highest levels of accomplishment possible.They are an inherent part of the work itself and consist of the nature of the work, the persons sense of gainment, level of office, and individu al development and improvement. These motivator needs can only be rewarded by stimulating, challenging, and absorbing work. Consequently, the goal of motivation should be to enhance individual growth and advancement, develop sense of accomplishment and li powerfulness, and provide recognition (Franken, 1994). psychology recognizes different perspectives of motivation. One of these viewpoints pertains to the idea of motivational inducements, other than known as incentives. Incentives are referenced from either the vantage point of internal, or that of external motivation. An inducement coming from within the individual is called intrinsic or internal motivation. It is, according to Morris and Maisto, about the . . . desire to fulfil a behavior that originates within the individual.An inducement coming from outside the individual is called external or extrinsic motivation. It is the aspiration to do or achieve a goal in order to acquire a type of incentives or escape or steer clear of punishment (Morris and Maisto, 1999, p.316). People are often induced by the presence of external incentives to perform expected tasks or avoid incurring punishment. For motivation experts, however, a person developing the internal type of motivation will reap more perdurable and beneficial effects compared with external motivation (Morris and Maisto, 1999). For instance, in taking care of a health check surgical unit and handling newly hired nurses with a hardly a(prenominal) years of experience only, myriads of problems are not remote possibilities. From issues of tardiness during call of duty, in irresponsibility in dispensing of medicines and relational clashes, to grave misconduct within the employment such as sexual harassment between employees, these are all stark realities that are emf complex problems. Initiating the Herzberg idea can probably be useful. I will groom first the few expert nurses and those who will be directly supervising others that they practice an d execute specific agenda for change magnitude motivation, one of which is Management by Objectives (MBO).It entails having faith in involving the employees in goal-setting and in decision-making. MBO works by incorporate goal-setting into individual participation in decision-making in order to establish individual work goals to which the employee feels reasonably committed. At the motivational level, it is theorized that resistance to change is decreased if individuals participate in decisions regarding change and that individuals accept and are more committed to decisions in which they have participated in making. To further encourage and plus involvement, the hospital provides suggestion boxes and stanch monthly contests where they give monetary rewards for the best three suggestions.These give the employee a sense of achievement and responsibility for its success. For this workplace in particular, the employees receive incentives in the form of Ladder promotion, general sala ry increase annually plus performance rating salary increases, CBA employees can expect a minimum of 15% increase in salary annually within three years and welfare benefits which include group insurances, medical insurance, accident benefits among others (Baron, 1983). A set-up like this goes to such great lengths at least to assure that it does something for sustaining employees morale and motivation.-Discuss the relationship between mission statements, planned change, and unplanned change. Use illustrations. The elements of organizational behavior lean upon managements plan and philosophy, vision and objectives. Basing on this foundation springs the organizational culture where the formal and informal types of organization and the social environment are best understood (Knoster et al., 2000). Every person in direct supervision of employees or workers knows the intricacies of leadership and management of people under his/her care. Whenever possible, it is to the best interest of the organization and employer in general that the workers perform their respective jobs efficiently and on a continuous or consistent manner. This is the aspiration of every owner of a company or those delegated to deliver their/his/her goals. However, this will only work so long as the individuals in their various places or positions know and understand what they want and where they want to go in the context of the overall goals of their organization.Intertwined in this idea is the fact that individuals are motivated to work not only for them but that the vision and mission, goals of the corporate world where they belong moldiness be their own also. Ownership as a motivational factor is critical for the survival and sustainability of both the individual worker and the organization as a whole.Studies reveal that how an organization runs depends upon every human person within the workplace functioning as he/she should be in order that productivity is achieved. This is actually a cyc lical picture both the organization or employer level and the rank and file levels must understand the team and group dynamics that must work to achieve their own objectives. However this seemed to be easy to understand, the applications of which are complex involving multiple disciplines (Mangelsdorff, 2007). mop up The problem of employee motivation is critical in all kinds of organizations today and is responsible for the shoddy products we buy and the imprudent service we receive. It was thought that all that was necessary to produce high motivation in workers was to pay them more this idea may no longer be valid for a large portion of the work force (Adams, 1965).Modern workers demand jobs that satisfy their inner needs for fulfillment, expression, and self-actualization. Traditional values involved faithfulness to the company and a strong drive for money, status, promotion and security. The new breed of workers focuses on self-fulfillment and self-actualization and demands j obs that are challenging and that allow participation in decision-making (McClelland, 1976). They have little loyalty to the organization and less concern with money, status and security. Psychologists have proposed several theories of motivation. The need for achievement by McClelland posits the existence to be the best in whatever they undertake. Studies show that good executives are higher in Ach than poor ones. High in ability and take calculated risks and set moderate achievement goals. These individuals constantly need feedback on their progress (Halonen Santrock, 1996). These theories deal with content of motivation, with internal needs that arouse and guide behavior. Process theories of motivation focus on the mental processes involved in making decisions and choices about work. This is illustrated in the goal-setting theory, which argues that employee motivation is defined by our intention to achieve a particular goal and equity theory, which deals with our perceived rati o or outcome to input and how equitably that ratio compares with those co-workers (Halonen Santrock, 1996). The workplace today considers any of the perspectives mentioned in this paper. However, what are more reflective at many organizations are their strategies in enhancing the life of the average worker. The understanding of the needs or drives that motivate people is and so critical in the choice of what motivator variables that the management may employ to encourage their people to do or sustain an excellent job or an efficient performance. Mentoring and its application is very much the stylus today in corporate America. It is a strategy employed by companies or institutions to enhance professionalism and the change magnitude transfer of learning and building of skills from the more adept and/or experienced to the junior or fledgling employee. It is also a way of improved retention rate within a company.ReferenceBaron, R. 1983. doings in Organizations Understanding and Ma naging the Human Side of Work, Boston Allyn and Bacon.Bruffee, Kenneth A. Collaborative Learning Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1993.Demick, J. and Miller, P., maturement in the Workplace, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, New Jersey, 1993.Druckman, Daniel, Jerome E. Singer, and Harold Van Cott (Editors) (1997). Enhancing Organizational Performance. National Academy Press Washington, D.C. (optional)Franken, R.E. 1994, Human Motivation (Belmont, CA, Wadsworth).Halonen, JS and JW Santrock, 1996. Psychology Contexts of style, Dubuque, IA Brown and Benchmark, p.810.Knoster, T., Villa, R., Thousand, J. (2000). Aframework for thinking about systems change. In R. Villa J. Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective information Piecing the puzzle together (pp. 93-128). Baltimore Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Landy, F.J. 1985. Psychology of Work behavior. 3rd Ed. Dorsey Press.Mangelsdorff, David A.2001. Organizational Behavior and Theory. Accessed wonderful 19, 2008 http//users.idworld.net/dmangels/orgbeh.htmMcClelland, D. C., Burnham, D. H. 1976. Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54(2), 100-110.McKenna, Eugene, 2000. Business Psychology and Organizational Behavior A Students Handbook. 3rd Ed. Psychology press Taylor and Francis Group.McNamara, Carter. 2006. Basic Overview of Various Strategic planning models. Retrieved August 19, 2008. http//www.managementhelp.org/plan_dec/str_plan/models.htmMorris, Charles G., Maisto, Albert A., 1999. Understanding Psychology.4th ed., scholar Hall New Jersey, pp.315-316.Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origin and Growth of Action Learning. Hunt, England Chatwell-Bratt, BickleyRobbins, Stephen P. 1997. Organizational Behavior Concepts, Controversies, Applications, Eighth Edition, Prentice Hall.Shortell, Stephen M. and Arnold D. Kaluzny. 2000. wellness Care Management Organization Design and Behavior, Fourth Edition, Delmar P ublishers Inc.Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origin and Growth of Action Learning. Hunt, England Chatwell-Bratt, BickleyRobbins, Stephen P. 1997. Organizational Behavior Concepts, Controversies, Applications, Eighth Edition, Prentice Hall.