Privacy and Misuse of Private Information Essay

Privacy and Misuse of private Information - analyse ExampleMore specifically, the essay willing address whether Clive fire prevent event of information regarding him, establish on the righteousness on breach of potency and protection of personal information. Privacy and misuse of Private Information According to Crone et al (2002, p 93), the enactment of the law on breach of confidence and protection of personal information resulted from the need to protect personal secrets. In the recent years, people set out used the law to prevent the worldation of confidential information, especially in the mass media. In Clives case, the Daily Scandal wants to publish information about him. An action for breach of confidence can be the most appropriate to prevent against publication of personal information. Clive can easily obtain an injunction restraining the publication of information regarding cheating on his wife and attending the notorious club. He should take legal action, in whic h the court will apply an action called blanket ban that prevents the magazine from publishing the photos. Under the law of breach of confidence, the Clive can prove several facts to prevent the periodical scandal from publishing the information. One of these facts can be showing that the information contains adequate quality of confidence. The daily scandal has threatened to publish secret information about Clive, without his authority. ... This gives Clive the opportunity to take an action against them on the basis of imputed confidential relationship. The court will grant the action of injunction since the differences between Clive and wife exact not featured in the public domain (Aplin 2007, p 145). Tanya (2007, p 334) asserts that a person has the right to prevent the publication of this information since it does not affect the public in any way. Under this law, the media should not publish information about a person if the information does not touch on the public. Matters re garding marital unfaithfulness can be considered to be private. As such, they should not be made public the information only refers to Clive and his wife. The media do not have an obligation to make public Clives personal information. Aplin observes that the law states that secrecy should not be subject instead, Clive and wife should be allowed to settle their differences using the due court process. Publicizing the wrongs of Clive will only worsen the relationship with his wife. As such, he can be in a position to deter the daily scandal from publicizing his photos and other information about him (Aplin 2007, p 150). He has the right to prevent the paper from publishing information regarding him since the information cannot be considered to be of public interest. Therefore, the daily scandal cannot defend itself on grounds of iniquity. The court does not intervene in the publication of public information concerning an iniquity (Stanley, 2009). In this case, the information conce rning Clive attending the club and cheating on his wife cannot be regarded to be of public interest. ground on this, the daily scandal does not have an obligation to expose Clives conduct. Thus, they should not publicize the