International Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

International Law - Case Study ExampleIn the build case, a totalitarian president, piquant has invaded the adjacent sovereign state Whiteland using muscle power. Neither the pot of Whiteland nor the political regime of the Whiteland, has non done anything wrong to provoke Barmy or the Redland. Moreover, the Redland president Barmy has not cited any reasons for his action and the annexation of the Whiteland.The above case has lot of similarities with the Saddam Husains seizure of Kuwait. Kuwaiti people never liked the intrusion of Saddam into the Kuwait territories. Saddams claim over Kuwait was unjustifiable and it was just an excuse Saddam put forward for attacking the neighboring state. By capturing Kuwait, Saddam has go against all the international laws regarding the sovereignty of a country or state.Sovereignty is one of the fundamental rights of separately country. It is the claim of having supreme, independent authority over a territory which is recognized by the United Nations. every last(predicate) the nations irrespective of what political ideologies they follow should respect the sovereignty of other independent states. Muscle power and deplumes should never be exercised upon a sovereign state without proper reasons.Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter states that the use of force is justified down the stairs only two circumstances in individual or collective self-defence, as outlined in Article 51, or pursuant to a Security Council resolution, as outlined in Article 42 (The War on Iraq Legal Issues, 2003)1. In the given case, Barmy or the Redland was not at all under any threats from the Whiteland and Barmys action cannot be justified. Nobody wants to be ruled by an autocratic or totalitarian administration. Such administration allow for use iron fist for suppressing the interests of the people. granting immunity of expression or any other basic human requirements will definitely be denied by a totalitarian ruler. When Saddam captur ed Kuwait, the international community and the Kuwaitis shouted against Saddam because of their fear against such totalitarian approach from Saddam Husain. Barmy was a totalitarian ruler and under his administration the Whiteland people will become slaves having their freedom cut down to a big zero. Whiteland worldly concern has every right to patch up about their administration and a civilized country will never wish to be under the administration of a totalitarian ruler at present. International law is an arcane subject for those at all levels of opinion, ranging from the general public to top opinion leaders (Perry, 1998). It is not possible for countries to progress by violating international laws. In a civilized society like the present one, integration of the interests of the people on a global basis is required. Globalization and Liberalization are policies aimed at the integration of the global public and the collective economic growth. Invading other countries for expandi ng the territories is a barbarian act which was prevalent in the superannuated societies. But the advancements in science and technology and the earlier lessons learned from international conflicts like the world wars energize drastically changed the social views about the expansion of territories. In short, capturing Whiteland, Barmy has violated all the international laws regarding the sovereignty, freedom, and reasoned rights of a country to select their administra