Childrens Morality Vs. How Moral Are You? :: essays research papers

A Reaction Paper to How Moral Are You? by Kohlberg, L. (1963) The Development of childrens orientationof moral thought & Telling The accuracy by Barasch, Douglas S.(Family Life)I read both of these articles and found them to be interesting. In the first article, How Moral Are You? published in Forty Studies that changed psychological science IV by Roger R. Hock, what is discussed is Lawrence Kohlbergs research on the formation of theology. Kohlberg believed the mightiness to moralize situations encountered in life develops in a specific course during our childhood years. He believed that a child must reach a certain stage and mentality in order to create a level of morality. I found the information he presented was interesting. Things such as each stage a child undergoes increases the understanding of the concept of morality and the stages always occur in a step-by-step pattern. Kohlberg reasoned the stages be prepotent, meaning the child understands every stage that he/she has been through and a vague idea of the stage above them (197). As for how he researched his scheme, the make seems simple enough. He supplied children of different ages with 10 hypothetical moral dilemmas(197). I found myself answering the questions about moral issues with confusion. The question that was most problematic to answer was the Heinz Dilemma in which a man commits a hatred to save his wife from dying. I would forgive his the husband actions because the druggist was being unsporting in his offering price for his medicine. That kind of druggist shouldnt be allowed to be creating drugs anywayhis business organisation is to aid people not the antithesis.I enjoyed reading this article but conceived of a few flaws in his system that he Kohlberg did not address though many other critiques did. The glitches in his theory were such as although Kohlberg represents an interpretation of morality, most of these ideas represent Hesperian cultures and failed to apply to non-Weste rn cultures. It was also difficult to apply his theory equally for both men and women. He did a wonderful job of explaining morality even though it would not stand up on its own in the years to come.The second article I read, I found to be similar to my first in the item that they both discussed moral reasoning of children and different so-called stages. It was published by Douglas S. Barasch in the 1998 February issue of the magazine, Family Life.