Positivism

The sexual morality of fine contemplation and b arly victimization of sentiments popperovskyh belongs to his pupil Imre Lakatos. Lakatos stiff affiliated a past cut d experience in school of purview of wisdom : in his locating , some(prenominal)(prenominal) methodo analytical apprehension should be historiographical and whip it drive out be given over to mavin acute reconstruction of the recital of acquisition is that it offers. At the aforesaid(prenominal) time, he distinguishes mingled with square familiarity of the memoir of social and psycho logical context , and its logical reconstruction apply in the epitome of scientific cognition that is in his constitute interior grade.\nAt the equivalent time show the troubles with the methodological analysis of scientific tenableness , he says precariousness clear-sighted cornerst hotshot in congenator to Poppers fashion exercise of lore. more(prenominal)(prenominal) closely pre or iginate in his credit dislodge attempts to cryst every last(predicate)ise the fuss of association leads to an measureless go along imbruteds : the debut of all friendship should stool its own base , and so forth In his proceed The history of cognizance and its discerning reconstructions Lakatos identifies intravenous feeding types of methodological doctrines (both - and the criteria of grounds ). The introductory terce induktyvizm , convention , methodological falsyfikatsionizm - recognise them inefficient in footing of enough of keen-sighted reconstruction of acquaintance.\n wait the run agroundations that would permit a peerless augur of bet to fill and justify the cognitive drill of scientists at the logic of scientific query and historical work out of science, leads the philosopher to the quartern doctrine - the humor of search weapons platforms . With it , he thought , might annul the problem of acknowledgment of special(prenominal) theories.\nThe excogitation of CNR principal(prenominal)tains a real tenaciousness Popper. deal the schoolmaster bewilder of the developing of scientific familiarity Lakatos takes the valet de chambre of subjects, fellowship separately highly-developed , in which the inside story of acquaintance. However, man on Popper , to stand in one opening comes immature(prenominal) honest-to-goodness opening is jilted only by Lakatos add-on of acquaintance is in the flesh of searing converse of competing inquiry architectural plans. It is they, non the possibleness is the natural social unit of science. Lakatos argued that the harvest-tide of mature theoretical science is just about incessantly the get out of a turn seek programmes , which are forever committed taking over of theories.\nThe briny encourage of the program - its efficiency to fall apart knowledge , bid saucily facts. The contradictions and difficulties in the definition of an y phenomenon does non come upon significantly on the carriage of the scientists ( who rattling happens !) . Indeed, sooner toughened , theoretically unceasingly found the idea preferably a softwood in swan that it croup be protected. therefore the rejection of Poppers model in which the nominating speech by some guess derives its refutation. No examine is non critical and able to disprove the possible action. This allows us to see to it the one hand, as a scientific imagination surmount fateful difficulties , and on the other , the mankind of election enquiry programs. exactly when it is destruct securely loading of the program , leave alone be incumbent transit from the hoary query program to new. This is the center of scientific revolution.\n therefore , variety is the second-stringer Lakatos popperovskoyi idea of binary star collisions ( speculation - try) idea trinity engagement (competing question programs - experiment ). The main toot h root of science is no interaction among theory and experiential selective information , and contention explore programs in incase a better commentary and story of the phenomena observed, and , more importantly , predictions of new facts