Local Government Consolidation

Running head : LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSOLIDATION[AUTHOR][AUTHOR AFFILIATION]Thesis : Local presidential term integrating fuel work on more or less sports stadiums of introductory government activity function like the release department , flagellate collection and disposal , storm piddle management , amusement and regional transportation facilities and servicesI . RationaleSince the introduction of the thought of topical anaesthetic government consolidation in the 1970s , somewhat local governments from the states of Wisconsin and atomic number 74 Virginia dumb lay down pee-peed delegacys and record groups to check into the lessons of early implementation of the functions and services of some local government . Both partial and beat consolidation and mergers sire been considered and recommendations for the bene fits and pitfalls of both approaches have also been depict . These studies were mainly found from several years of experiences from other states and locales that have had some successes in its implementation of the concept . The focus was on the processes of its implementation and the affable system of bureaucracy that implemented the consolidation that make it take after or a failII . Summary of lessons from each area1 .1 VirginiaWith Virginia , the review committee just submitted its findings last February 2005 [3] . The summary of its findings were as follows1 .1 .1 . Of the characteristics of favored consolidations and reorganizations , it was found that in that respect is streamlined democratic control1 .1 .2 . A corporate or integrated local government social organization piece of ass be transformed into a General Purpose delegacy , one that is flexible enough to function and serve whenever and wherever needed1 .1 .3 . The organized structure also is enabl ed to have its own accommodation Independe! nt Financial Resources . It generally means that the unified structure has the ability or is empowered to be able to shift its own operational fundsOf the Positive or successful characteristics of consolidation , here are the summary of findings1 .2 .1 on that point is cut down duplication of governmental services and functions . Thus , it saves tax funds and workforce resources that can be used elsewhere1 .2 .2 . There is increase recognise strength . Unified government structures have merge acceptation and fundraising capacity as well1 .2 .3 . There is an ability to draw out national or state funding Precisely because of the unified structure and large population base the coverage area warrants bigger federal and state funding allocation1 .2 .4 . Improved speech of services1 .2 .5 . There is also an improved image for a unified and coalesced government . Specifically because of the new and streamlined structure there is more facility to encourage and assists busin esses and new industries to relocate and create a bigger market for its products , thus back up influx of investorsMeanwhile the negative results of consolidation have been found to be as follows1 .3 .1 There is immediate loss of identity and indecorum for the littler government entities1 .3 .2 . There are fewer local jobs and pick out officials1 .3 .3 . There is a resultant higher(prenominal) tax and fees for suburban and rural residents1 .3 .4 . There is higher initial...If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper